Current:Home > InvestExpert witnesses for Trump's defense billed almost $900,000 each for testifying on his behalf at fraud trial -AssetScope
Expert witnesses for Trump's defense billed almost $900,000 each for testifying on his behalf at fraud trial
View
Date:2025-04-15 22:19:39
New York City — Former President Donald Trump sat attentively in the courtroom of his New York civil fraud trial on Thursday, watching as the defense's final expert witness, Eli Bartov, proclaimed that there was "no evidence whatsoever of any accounting fraud."
On Friday, Bartov revealed that he has made approximately $877,500 for his expert testimony in this case — charging $1,350 per hour for about 650 hours of work. When questioned by lawyers for the state of New York about who was paying him, Bartov replied that his bank statements showed some of the money was paid by the Trump Organization and some came from Trump's Save America PAC.
The discussion of Bartov's compensation came shortly after one of Trump's attorneys, Alina Habba, expressed her frustration to Judge Engoron about objections made by the attorney general's team.
"Why are we wasting our time if no one is listening to the words coming out of our experts' mouths?" Habba asked.
Another expert witness for the defense, Frederick Chin, who testified earlier in the week on real estate valuation, admitted that he billed $850 per hour for 1,000 hours of work, totaling $850,000. The state's only expert witness, Michael McCarty, acknowledged that he was paid a rate of $950 per hour, but worked far fewer hours, estimating that he made about $350,000 for his testimony.
These rates provide a glimpse into the high costs of just one of Trump's many legal battles, a set of criminal and civil challenges for which the Save America PAC spent $40 million in the first half of this year alone.
Trump stayed at the courthouse all day for Thursday's proceedings and periodically spoke outside the courtroom throughout the day, lauding Bartov, an accounting professor at New York University's Stern School of Business, and his testimony several times.
"This is a disgraceful situation. Never seen anything like it," said Trump. "But this expert witness, highly respected by everybody, with a resume that few people have ever seen before, said there was no fraud, there was no accounting fraud, there was nothing."
He later praised Bartov's credentials as "a leading expert, a leading person, a man who sits on the Pulitzer committee, most respected person, the Stern School, NYU, top professor, a very honest man who by the way, (is) very honorable," and said, "If he didn't agree, he wouldn't say what he's saying. And he said these were incredible loans. I didn't even need the money."
Bartov himself seemed to be a witness tailor-made for the former president in his superlative assessments of Trump's financial statements.
"I've never seen a statement that provides so much detail and is so transparent," he said. "The footnotes provide an awesome amount of information."
The professor also said that if the statements were turned in as a project in his class, "they would get an A."
The state's attorneys expressed skepticism about Bartov's findings, leading to some heated moments in the courtroom.
"This is pure speculation from someone that they've hired to say just whatever it is they want in this case," attorney Kevin Wallace, a lawyer for the state attorney general, said during an objection to Bartov's testimony Thursday.
Trump's attorney, Jesus Suarez replied, "Oh that's nasty, man."
"It is," said Wallace.
"Very rude," said Suarez.
Bartov then shouted at Wallace, "You ought to be ashamed of yourself for talking like that. You make up allegations that never existed. There is no evidence of this."
In his testimony, Bartov strongly disputed the grounds of the lawsuit brought by Letitia James, the New York attorney general, saying that from an accounting perspective, it has no merit. He said that Trump's use of disclaimers in his financial statements clearly indicated that lenders should do their own due diligence and downplayed discrepancies in the financial statements, explaining that lenders are expected to make their own independent valuations.
"To me, the case isn't about valuations. It's about statements of financial conditions," said Judge Engoron during a tense exchange with Trump's attorneys on Friday. "You can't use false statements in business. That's what the summary judgment decision was all about. I think it's pretty much what the rest of this case was about."
Judge Engoron ruled before the trial began that Trump and the other defendants were liable for fraud in a partial summary judgment. Trump, his older two sons Donald Jr and Eric, and their company are accused of inflating the value of assets on key financial records to obtain favorable loans and insurance deals. They have denied wrongdoing in the case.
Trump, who already testified last month, is scheduled to return to court on Monday, Dec. 11.
Cross-examination of Bartov is expected to resume on Tuesday, as this case comes to a close.
— Graham Kates contributed to this report.
- In:
- Fraud
- Donald Trump
- New York City
veryGood! (23)
Related
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- 2024 Emmys: Why Gillian Anderson and Peter Morgan Are Fueling Reconciliation Rumors
- Taylor Swift's Mom Andrea Swift Wears Sweet Tribute to Travis Kelce at Chiefs Game
- What did the Texans trade for Stefon Diggs? Revisiting Houston's deal for former Bills WR
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- 2024 Emmys: Naomi Watts Shares Rare Insight Into Relationship With Husband Billy Crudup
- Quentin Johnston personifies Jim Harbaugh effect for 2-0 Los Angeles Chargers
- ‘Beetlejuice Beetlejuice’ is No. 1 again; conservative doc ‘Am I Racist’ cracks box office top 5
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- 2024 Emmys: Lamorne Morris Swears He Knows Where Babies Come From—And No, It's Not From the Butt
Ranking
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Who Is In the Banana Costume at the 2024 Emmy Awards? How a Reality Star Stole the Red Carpet Spotlight
- 2024 Emmys Fans Outraged After Shelley Duvall Left Out of In Memoriam Segment
- NATO military committee chair backs Ukraine’s use of long range weapons to hit Russia
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- ‘The Life of Chuck’ wins the Toronto Film Festival’s People’s Choice Award
- CMA Awards snub Beyoncé, proving Black women are still unwelcome in country music
- Emmy Awards 2024 live updates: 'The Bear,' 'Baby Reindeer' win big early
Recommendation
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Man convicted of trying to arrange the murder of a federal prosecutor
What game is Tom Brady broadcasting in Week 2? Where to listen to Fox NFL analyst
Quentin Johnston personifies Jim Harbaugh effect for 2-0 Los Angeles Chargers
The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
Trump is safe after shots were reported in his vicinity in Florida, Secret Service and campaign say
Washington State football's Jake Dickert emotional following Apple Cup win vs Washington
Saints stun Cowboys, snap NFL's longest active regular-season home win streak